I’ve been watching a guy on YouTube who uses one of them for ice fishing. Talk about neat!I use garmen. Cheaper side scan not fancy but fancy for me. I’m pretty sure the market of fish finders are. Wry close and prob when used correctly are pretty much the same.
Side note. I want a under water Aqua vu to take under water video.
In my adult life I have only used Lowrance. That's what all the guys I was talking to back then were using. I never learned how to really use it, though. I would like to.
Gotta buddy who uses those cameras on the ice he says the fish are funny some come right up to the camera like bluegill and some like walleye shy away. They know the cameras there.I’ve been watching a guy on YouTube who uses one of them for ice fishing. Talk about neat!
I know I’ve mentioned it, I’m a Garmin fan. I think you get a lot for the price, especially if you take advantage of their yearly Black Friday sales.
I'm happy to tag along anytime we can put it together.You’re in a very large segment of anglers. I hang out in groups and forums based on these finders and talk to other boaters at the lakes and for the most part, most are of the same thought. It takes a lot of time to learn them and to get to the point that you can credit the finder for actually catching that fish you just caught.
I became proficient with them on salt water, salt is easier as you’re focused mostly on fish, not structure. Learning structure kicked my butt until I installed Livescope. Livescope really helped me visualize what I was seeing on the graph vs the “real” world view on LS.
With that said, if any of you guys want to jump on board this year, say the word. I can show you what I see and why I see it and explain it with a Livescope view that will make sense.